Page 20 - CIWA-AR24
P. 20
CIWA 2.0 Results Framework
Table 2: CIWA 2.0 Results Framework
CIWA 2.0 indicator Relationship to TOC and PDO
PDO Indicator 1: US dollars influenced It is assumed that multiple cooperative process must have been
for cooperative management and strengthened such as data sharing, having an agreement or MOU,
development investments. possibly have jointly agreed regional policies that apply, costs and
benefits sharing, joint risk assessments, and engaging in
negotiations for every regional investment that progress to a
PDO Indicator 2: Number of people feasibility assessment. The PDO indicators are proxy measurements
benefiting from improved water for the cooperative processes that must be in place to deliver a
resources management and potential or mobilized investment. At the higher level, cooperation is
development investments. not the end goal but rather a requirement for joint development.
CIWA's development objective is to deliver cooperation that is used
for joint WRM and development but the actual development is
expected to be implemented through other means such as private
finance, lending, or IDA funding.
1. Institutions strengthened to Information development and institutional strengthening can take
improve regional cooperation.
many forms and address many issues. IR indicators 1a-1c all measure
aspects of institutional strengthening that can contribute to
improved capacity, equitability, horizontal and vertical cooperation,
sustainability, and improved leadership. CIWA’s approach to
influencing regional WRM and development solutions is that
improved information and institutions drive cooperation and better
investments. Therefore, this is an intermediate outcome with regards
to influencing investments that support sustainable and equitable
used water for the good of environment and people.
Institutions with improved CIWA’s approach to cooperation includes both horizontal and vertical
1.a engagement of civil society, engagements. Results from this indicator track the inclusion of different
private sector, and academia. levels than RBOs and national institutions in WRM and development
planning and implementation.
Institutions with increased Indicator 1b demonstrates results that contribute to sustainability
water resources management and cooperation by enhancing transparency and accountability to
1.b
and development information the public.
in the public domain.
Institutions using improved
This indicator measures a higher order result than the provision of
analytical tools, knowledge
analytical tools, knowledge products, data, forecasting, and/or
products, data and forecasting
1.c capacity (Indicator 1) by measuring how individual institutions use the
for improved water and climate
tools for improved water and climate risk management or investment
risk management or investment
coordination.
coordination.
Number of people that This indicator tracks the total number of people that participate in
2. participate in CIWA funded CIWA activities, which is usually distinct from the people that benefit
activities. from investments.
15
