Page 16 - Biodiversity and Conservation Framework
P. 16

Biodiversity & Conservation Framework


             Annex A                                            ILM  also  supports  integration  across  sectors  and  scales,
                                                                increasing coordination. Similarly, it ensures the harmonization of
                                                                planning,  implementation,  and  monitoring  processes  at  the
             Tools and Solutions                                landscape,  sub-national,  and  national  levels.  By  coordinating
                                                                strategies and encouraging synergies between different levels of
             Integrated Water Resources Management              government, ILM can create cost efficiencies at multiple levels.
                                                                Given that ILM supports an inclusive, participatory process that
             IWRM  promotes  the  coordinated  development  and  engages  all  stakeholders  in  collaborative  decision-making  and
             management  of  water-  and  land-related  resources  to  management, it can also empower local communities.
             maximize  economic  and  social  welfare  in  an  equitable
             manner  without  compromising  the  sustainability  of  A  wholescape  approach²⁰  provides  a  framework  that  integrates
             ecosystems.  The  process  promotes  the  coordinated  and  supplements  current  practices  so  that  they  best  support
             development and management of water, land, and related  conservation  and  restoration  of  freshwater  biodiversity.  A
             resources  to  maximize  economic  and  social  welfare  in  an  fundamental issue in management of transboundary waters and
             equitable manner, without compromising the sustainability  their biodiversity is ensuring connectivity between elements of the
             of vital ecosystems and the environment. IWRM is a cross-  land and water bodies from source to coast. This is vital to maintain
             sectoral policy approach designed to replace the traditional,  an appropriate flow of water, nutrients, and sediment that define
             fragmented  sectoral  approach  to  water  resources  water resources, the migration and dispersal of species upstream
             management  that  has  led  to  poor  services  and  and  downstream,  laterally  with  floodplains,  vertically  with
             unsustainable  resource  use.  IWRM  is  based  on  the  groundwater, and over time. A second key issue is that while many
             understanding  that  water  resources  are  an  integral  ecosystems have a role in the hydrological cycle, the nature of this
             component  of  the  ecosystem,  a  natural  resource,  and  a  influence  changes  between  ecosystems  and  with  their  location
             social and economic public good.¹⁶                 within  the  landscape.  A  wholescape  approach  should  underpin
                                                                transboundary water strategies and projects, including the use of
             Integrated Landscape Management /                  NBS and monitoring programs, and expose the dependencies and
             Wholescape Approach                                provide cohesion between nations sharing water.
             Transboundary natural resource management (TBNRM) is an  Natural capital and nature-based solutions
             important tool in broad landscape approaches to sustainable
             natural  resource  management  and  biodiversity  conservation.  Natural  capital  can  be  defined  as  the  world’s  stock  of  natural
             TBNRM  is  defined  as  any  process  of  collaboration  across  assets, which include geology, soil, air, water, and all living beings
             boundaries that increases the effectiveness of attaining natural  and things. Humans derive a wide range of services, often called
             resource  management  or  biodiversity  conservation  goals.¹⁷  ecosystem services, from natural capital, which make human life
             Ecological  opportunities  include  maintaining  or  restoring  possible.  The  most  obvious  ecosystem  services  include  food,
             linkages  and  ecosystems  in  ecological  landscapes  across  water,  plant  materials  used  for  fuel,  building  materials,  and
             borders, reducing transboundary threats to promote sustainable  medicines. There are also many less visible ecosystem services
             use of natural resources, renewal of cooperation and cultural  such  as  the  climate  regulation  and  natural  flood  defenses
             ties among communities severed by colonial borders, increased  provided  by  forests,  the  billions  of  tons  of  carbon  stored  by
             welfare  and  development  opportunities  for  populations,  the  peatlands,  and  the  pollination  of  crops  by  insects.  Even  less
             development  of  a  regional  economic  base  through  tourism,  visible  are  cultural  ecosystem  services  such  as  the  inspiration
             improved access and linkages, and economies of scale.   taken from wildlife and the natural environment.²¹

             Integrated Landscape Management (ILM) is an increasingly  Poorly managed natural capital becomes not only an ecological
             popular and innovative approach to land management that  liability, but also a social and economic liability. Working against
             reduces  land-use  conflicts,  empowers  communities,  nature by overexploiting natural capital can be catastrophic not
             addresses climate change, supports water and food security,  just  for  biodiversity  loss,  but  also  for  humans  as  ecosystem
             and achieves development objectives at the landscape scale.  productivity and resilience decline over time and some regions
             ILM  refers  to  long-term  collaboration  among  different  become  more  prone  to  extreme  events  such  as  floods  and
             groups  of  land  managers  and  stakeholders  to  achieve  the  droughts. Ultimately, this makes it more difficult for communities
             multiple objectives required from the landscape built on the  to  sustain  themselves,  particularly  in  already  stressed
             principles  of  participation,  negotiation,  and  cooperation.¹⁸  ecosystems, potentially leading to hunger or starvation, conflict
             ILM  has  the  best  chance  of  succeeding  when  policies,  over resource scarcity, and displacement of populations.²²
             markets, and financial conditions support it. Through long-
             term collaboration among different groups of stakeholders,  Nature-based  solutions  are  often  a  cost-effective  approach  to
             ILM  supports  the  achievement  of  multiple  objectives  water resource management, disaster risk reduction, and climate
             required  from  the  landscape,  such  as  agricultural  change mitigation.²³ Although there is no internationally agreed
             production;  delivery  of  ecosystem  services;  provision  of  definition  of  NBS,  the  International  Union  for  Conservation  of
             ecosystem services (e.g., water flow regulation and quality,  Nature  (IUCN)  Global  Standard  for  Nature-based  Solutions  is
             pollination,  climate  change  mitigation  and  adaptation,  used here: “actions to protect, sustainably manage, and restore
             cultural  values);  protection  of  biodiversity,  landscape  natural or modified ecosystems that address societal challenges
             beauty,  identity,  and  recreation  value;  and  inclusivity  of  effectively and adaptively, simultaneously providing human well-
             local livelihoods, human health, and well-being.¹⁹  being and biodiversity benefits.”



             ¹⁶ https://www.unep.org/explore-topics/disasters-conflicts/where-we-work/sudan/what-integrated-water-resources-
             management#:~:text=Integrated%20Water%20Resources%20Management%20(IWRM,the%20sustainability%20of%20vital%20ecosystems.
             ¹⁷ Ibid.
             ¹⁸ Thaxton, M., Shames, S., and Scherr, S.J. EcoAgriculture Partners. UNCCD. Global Land Outlook Working Paper. Integrated Landscape Management.
             ¹⁹ Scherr, S.J., Shames, S., and Friedman, R., EcoAgriculture Partners 2013. Defining Integrated Landscape Management for Policy Makers.
             ²⁰  https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/global-sustainability/article/resilient-rivers-and-connected-marine-systems-a-review-of-mutual-sustainability-
             opportunities/925D17EE3A761A169549CE4FE17036A9
             ²¹ http://www.naturalcapitalforum.com/what-is-natural-capital
    12       ²² Ibid.
             ²³ Browder et al., 2019.
   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21