Page 80 - CIWA AR25

Annexes
A n n exe s

ANNEX 1 — Allocations

5
Annex 1 describes the CIWA portfolio in terms of the proportion of its allocations according to grant
types, partner types, engagements (geographical), and primary outcomes. The key points are:

Figure A1.1 shows that RETF grants dominate the portfolio. The Security Initiative grant (US$2m), the Green, Resilient and Inclusive
two active RETF grants are the NCCR and SADC Groundwater Development grant (for OMVS/DREVE; US$8.5m), and the Drought
Management Phase 2 projects. Allocations to pipeline RETFs include Resilience Support in Southern Africa grant (US$3m). In FY25 the
the Transboundary Groundwater Management and Development cumulative RETF percent is increased from FY24 (62 percent).
k
a
e
a
d
C
h
S
$
(
U
5
,
L
m
)
o
r
c
t
te
r
W
a
l
t
M
u
S
e
i
-
i in Eastern Africa grant (US$5m), Lake Chad Multi-Sector Water
A
n
i
r
f
a
E
n
r
te
s
r
g
a
t
n
a
c
Figure A1.1. Allocations by Grant Type 23.1%
Bank-Executed Direct
Support to Clients
7.9%
66% Preparation and
Preparation and
Recipient-Executed Grants Supervision for
Recipient Executed
Bank-Executed
3%
Africa-Wide
partners are regional RBOs. The breakdown aligns with CIWA’s
Figure A1.2 shows that CIWA’s cumulative portfolio includes a partners are regional RBOs. The breakdown aligns with CIWA’s
intention to provide long-term sustained support to regional
wide diversity of regional institutions. As in previous years, the intention to provide long-term sustained support to regional
majority (64 percent) of RETF clients and technical assistance RBOs while also diversifying support to new types of partners.
Figure A1.2. Allocations by Partner Type
13%
Regional Economic
Commission
12%
National Government
64%
6%
River Basin
Organization
Organization Nongovernmental
Organization
4%
Africa-Wide
Bank Executed
1% Transboundary utility
5 Every year’s allocation analysis is cumulative except where explicitly described otherwise and includes pipeline allocations, which are listed in Table A4.5 of the
respective CIWA Annual Report. Caveats are present in the longitudinal allocation data because changes can occur in the pipeline (although endorsed by the Advisory

Committee) and major country context shifts can also be influential.
80